These files are maintained strictly for historical reference, research, and recordkeeping purposes,
and the content has not been altered or updated since archiving.
Content on this site may not meet current digital accessibility standards.
If you require an alternative, accessible format of any information found on this site,
please contact Bruce Jones, bjones@ucsd.edu to request an accommodation.

These files are maintained strictly for historical reference, research, and recordkeeping purposes,
and the content has not been altered or updated since archiving.
Content on this site may not meet current digital accessibility standards.
If you require an alternative, accessible format of any information found on this site,
please contact Bruce Jones, bjones@ucsd.edu to request an accommodation.

Re: [xmca] IQ testing and school based evaluation

From: Mike Cole <lchcmike who-is-at gmail.com>
Date: Wed Dec 12 2007 - 09:40:52 PST

Eric. if you are Eric, I am mike.
Sort of a southern california cultural convention to use first names that
can be very
irritating in some situations, but important, I believe, not to haul out
credentials in
this discussion group because it only gets in the way of participation. This
is a mutual
growth enterprise, not a status marking one.
mike

On Dec 12, 2007 8:01 AM, <ERIC.RAMBERG@spps.org> wrote:

>
> Bruce, Kevin, et al.:
>
> A topic near and dear to my heart. The question of standardized tests
> providing measures of intelligence was found to be contextual by Scribner
> and Cole's "Psychology of Literacy" project and has continued to be shown
> to be a measure of cultural intelligence rather then individual
> intelligence by the years of those who write in the cross-cultural
> tradition (i.e. Cole, Traupman, Glick, McDermott, etc.). See for instance
> the first run Newsletter of the Institute for Comparative Human
> Development.
>
> http://lchc.ucsd.edu/Histarch/sp76v1n1.pdf
>
> Also, if people are so inclined I have never pushed this on the listserve
> but at this point I see no reason in not submitting my humble paper.
> Negative comments are more welcome then no comments and of course praise
> is
> most appreciated. Also, Dr. Cole I apologize if your theories are
> misrepresented.
>
> (See attached file: zzzzzzzzzzzzzz.doc)
>
> _______________________________________________
> xmca mailing list
> xmca@weber.ucsd.edu
> http://dss.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/xmca
>
>
_______________________________________________
xmca mailing list
xmca@weber.ucsd.edu
http://dss.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/xmca
Received on Wed Dec 12 09:46 PST 2007

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Mon Jan 07 2008 - 10:13:50 PST