These files are maintained strictly for historical reference, research, and recordkeeping purposes,
and the content has not been altered or updated since archiving.
Content on this site may not meet current digital accessibility standards.
If you require an alternative, accessible format of any information found on this site,
please contact Bruce Jones, bjones@ucsd.edu to request an accommodation.

These files are maintained strictly for historical reference, research, and recordkeeping purposes,
and the content has not been altered or updated since archiving.
Content on this site may not meet current digital accessibility standards.
If you require an alternative, accessible format of any information found on this site,
please contact Bruce Jones, bjones@ucsd.edu to request an accommodation.


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: [xmca] about emotions



>From that Stanford's list, I only read this title:

Sartre, Jean-Paul. 1948. The Emotions: Outline of a
Theory. New York: Philosophical Library.

It is nothing really great, "emotion as magic" is the main idea... and some kind of moralistic approach,
common to this author. Zaporozhets understand that emotions have a realistic importance too,
and criticizes several visions of emotion only as a kind of disintegration of consciousness, including
Sartre's one. This you can see in recent publication of a translation from a Zaporozhets article in the 
Journal of Russian and East European Psychology.

But I read Aritotle Rethorics that have a long section about how to elicit emotions in the audience,
(see the Book Second, with 26 chapters)... Unfortunately I saw more contributions in Aristotle than 
in Sartre, at least Aristotle have a long typology, and some kind of ancient understanding about some
relations between emotions and language, despite his only descriptive not genetic approach. And I read, 
of course, Spinoza's Ethics, much better than Aristotle, certainly. But both this references are not at 
that the Stanford bibliographic list. I consider curious these omissions, there are only indirect quotes... 
If Eric's observation about dichotomy in the summary have something related to dualistic views, 
Spinoza's absence, at least, is justifiable... I have Damasio's book about Spinoza and emotions too,
it is very interesting, but he don´t have problems in put together Spinoza and William James, some
think that is not so in this way for Vygotsky for instance...

I don´t know what happens to Chabrier, why he had only one work... Why only Vygostky seems to be
concerned in quote him. There is a revision about emotions from the year 1912, in "Psycholgogical
Bulletin"... and Chabrier is quoted:

http://www.archive.org/stream/psychologicalbul09ameruoft/psychologicalbul09ameruoft_djvu.txt

Thank you very much.

Achilles.


> From: achilles_delari@hotmail.com
> To: xmca@weber.ucsd.edu
> Subject: RE: [xmca] about emotions
> Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2009 20:11:02 +0000
> 
> 
> That dichotomy is the way of thinking against Vygotsky and Chabrier were
> at that time.
> Achilles.
> 
> > To: xmca@weber.ucsd.edu
> > Subject: RE: [xmca] about emotions
> > From: ERIC.RAMBERG@spps.org
> > Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2009 10:27:20 -0600
> > 
> > As I was reading the summary referenced below I was struck by the 
> > dichotomy of emotions and society.  So much so that they can instigate an 
> > interruption to a person's participation in society.  Perhaps emotions are 
> > societies nemesis?
> > 
> > what do other's think?
> > 
> > 
> > eric
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > ERIC.RAMBERG@spps.org
> > Sent by: xmca-bounces@weber.ucsd.edu
> > 11/25/2009 09:30 AM
> > Please respond to "eXtended Mind, Culture, Activity"
> > 
> >  
> >         To:     "eXtended Mind, Culture, Activity" <xmca@weber.ucsd.edu>
> >         cc: 
> >         Subject:        RE: [xmca] about emotions
> > 
> > 
> > I thought this was a well done review of the philosophy of emotion:
> > http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/emotion/
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > Achilles Delari Junior <achilles_delari@hotmail.com>
> > Sent by: xmca-bounces@weber.ucsd.edu
> > 11/25/2009 12:36 AM
> > Please respond to "eXtended Mind, Culture, Activity"
> > 
> >  
> >         To:     "eXtended Mind, Culture, Activity" <xmca@weber.ucsd.edu>
> >         cc: 
> >         Subject:        RE: [xmca] Vygotsky and J. F. Chabrier - about 
> > emotions
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > Oh, sure, this a problem, above all, a problem not only a postulate.
> > I don't know about Winnicott, but human objects have a meaning too,
> > this semiotic dimension of an object, by any process is converted from
> > social relations to the social structure of personality... Vygotsky 
> > emphasizes ideological process in human emotion constitutions, for 
> > instance the difference between cellos in the Mussulman culture and
> > in occidental culture... And even historical transformations in our way
> > to feel something... including love... This seems to be an interesting
> > approach, because seems to trace a kind of anthropological view to
> > the question. Not only our tools, actions and signs historically 
> > developed,
> > but our emotions too, in a systemic and inter-functional set. These 
> > are some ideas that pass through me reading this chapter. But most
> > part of time Vygotsky is criticizing Descartes, James/Lange, Freud,
> > Scheler/Lotze... and his own affirmative position is only announced.
> > Winnicott can be a good contribution, I don´t know, how important
> > is the culture and the history to Winniccot? These transitional objetcs
> > chances only in form retaining the unconscious contends? Or the un-
> > conscious contends can change ideologically, culturally and historically?
> > How constitutional can be history, culture and ideology in human feelings?
> > The sample of Alighieri is very interesting... How many social process 
> > are important in love, for instance... not immediated ones, has you say,
> > but mediated process... Its complex, Vygotsky refuses the "peripheral
> > hypothesis, than the central, properly human, neuro-functional formations
> > will take a decisive role em the entire process... I don´t now, I only
> > have a problem, not sufficiently organized of course. I had read about
> > "perezhivanie" and its metodologycal role as "dynamic unit"... and 
> > emotions
> > are close, even they are not the same. 
> > 
> > Thank you, Andy.
> > Best wishes.
> > Achilles. 
> > 
> > > Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2009 17:09:03 +1100
> > > From: ablunden@mira.net
> > > To: xmca@weber.ucsd.edu
> > > Subject: Re: [xmca] Vygotsky and J. F. Chabrier - about emotions
> > > 
> > > Achilles, this is a fascinating problem, isn't it? It's 
> > > kinda way out of my area, but can I just offer a couple of 
> > > innane observations from my own remote point of view?
> > > 
> > > 1. We should think of the body as an artifact which as such 
> > > plays the same mediating role in consciousness as do other 
> > > artifacts. We have a thought, our stomach tenses up, we feel 
> > > that tension in the stomach.  Thus the emotional reaction in 
> > > our guts mediates our feeling about the thought. etc.
> > > 
> > > 2. Donald Winnicott's current of psychoanalysis for all its 
> > > faults brings Freud much closer to CHAT by his study of 
> > > (transitional) objects which act as mediating elements for 
> > > us, bearers of affect and association. Same kind of thing as 
> > > 1., but the artifact is external to the body, but has 
> > > pesonal meaning.
> > > 
> > > Andy
> > > 
> > > Achilles Delari Junior wrote:
> > > > Some quotes, from Vygotsky
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > Little attention has been given to this aspect of the problem because 
> > the problem
> > > > of man did not at all arise before contemporary psychology. But from 
> > the very
> > > > beginning, even the authors of the theory and their critics understood 
> > 
> > that in the
> > > > visceral hypothesis, they were speaking in essence of the animal 
> > nature of human
> > > > emotions. We will cite Chabrier, who advanced this idea in the most 
> > complete form.
> > > > Chabrier says that with this problem, we penetrate into the heart of 
> > the problem
> > > > and touch on the major objection that rises against the peripheral 
> > theory. When
> > > > we are speaking about instincts, we have before us an absolutely and 
> > invariably
> > > > established mechanism, which is activated automatically as soon as an 
> > appropriate
> > > > stimulation appears. It is possible that this is true also with 
> > respect to the primitive
> > > > emotions of the child, but it cannot be the same with respect to the 
> > usual emotions
> > > > of adults. (Vygotsky, 1999, p. 206)
> > > > 
> > > > Chabrier completely justifiably refers to the fact that a feeling of 
> > hunger, usually
> > > > considered in the group of lower bodily feelings in civilized man, is 
> > already a
> > > > fine feeling from the point of view of the nomenclature of James, that 
> > 
> > the simple
> > > > need of food can acquire a religious sense when it leads to the 
> > appearance of a
> > > > symbolic rite of mystical communication between man and God. And 
> > conversely,
> > > > a religious feeling, usually considered as a purely spiritual emotion, 
> > 
> > in pious cannibals
> > > > bringing human sacrifices to the gods, can scarcely he referred to the 
> > 
> > group
> > > > of higher emotions. Consequently, there is no emotion that by nature 
> > would be
> > > > independent of the body and not connected with it. James' book, The 
> > VrJrieties of
> > > > Religious Experience, shows incontrovertibly the extent to which 
> > higher feelings are
> > > > closely connected with all the fibers of our body. (Vygotsky, 1999, p. 
> > 
> > 207)
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > Separating emotions from the development of a system of ideas and 
> > establishing
> > > > their dependence exclusively on organic structures, James inevitably 
> > comes
> > > > to the fatalistic conception of emotions which encompasses animals and 
> > 
> > man
> > > > equally. The serious differences that human emotions display depending 
> > 
> > on the
> > > > era, the degree of civilization, the difference between mystical 
> > adoration of a knight
> > > > for his lady and the noble gallantry of the seventeenth century, 
> > remain unexplained
> > > > from the point of view of this theory. Chabrier says, if we imagine 
> > the infinitely
> > > > rich nature of the poorest emotion, if we pay less attention to the 
> > imaginary psychology
> > > > of single-celled organisms than to the remarkable analysis of 
> > novelists and
> > > > writers, if we simply make use of valuable data supplied by 
> > observations of people
> > > > around us, we cannot but admit the complete failure of the peripheral 
> > theory. Actually,
> > > > it is impossible to admit that simple perception of a female 
> > silhouette automatically
> > > > evoked an endless series of organic reactions of which could be born 
> > love
> > > > such as the love of Dante for Beatrice if we do not previously assume 
> > the whole
> > > > ensemble of theological, political, esthetic, and scientific ideas 
> > that comprised the
> > > > consciousness of the genius, AJighieri. (Vygosky, 1999, p. 207)
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > I have atached before, to you see something, but perhaps with these 
> > direct quotes
> > > > you can tell me more about... Mainlly the question about historical, 
> > cultural ideological 
> > > > constitution of human emotions... If the development of this could not 
> > 
> > be looking for
> > > > in Past, any suggestions about clues in present and future are very 
> > welcome too.
> > > > 
> > > > Thank you very much.
> > > > Achilles
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > >> From: achilles_delari@hotmail.com
> > > >> To: xmca@weber.ucsd.edu
> > > >> Subject: RE: [xmca] Vygotsky and J. F. Chabrier - about emotions
> > > >> Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2009 00:00:07 +0000
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >> Oh, incredible! Thank you very much. You are a "power plant",
> > > >> always working.
> > > >>
> > > >> Oh, "thick" have many meanings, I see. But, if it is about number 
> > > >> of pages, there are 157 pages.... according my Google sources...
> > > >>
> > > >> Then you see, please, what must I do to pay the order.
> > > >>
> > > >> Muito obrigado.
> > > >> Achilles.
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >>> Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2009 15:03:23 -0800
> > > >>> Subject: Re: [xmca] Vygotsky and J. F. Chabrier - about emotions
> > > >>> From: lchcmike@gmail.com
> > > >>> To: xmca@weber.ucsd.edu
> > > >>> CC: VEER@fsw.leidenuniv.nl
> > > >>>
> > > >>> Achilles!!
> > > >>>
> > > >>> Voila!!   The book is in library at UC Berkeley. I have ordered it. 
> > Lets see
> > > >>> how thick it is.
> > > >>> :-)
> > > >>> mike
> > > >>>
> > > >>> On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 2:49 PM, mike cole <lchcmike@gmail.com> 
> > wrote:
> > > >>>
> > > >>>> I cannot find a thing, Achilles.
> > > >>>> Lets see if we can elicit some help.
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> Rene-- Do you know of this work? Is it of enduring signicance?
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> mike
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 3:01 AM, Achilles Delari Junior <
> > > >>>> achilles_delari@hotmail.com> wrote:
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>>> Hi XMCA,
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>> How are you? I wish fine.
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>> I was studding the Vygotsky's "Teaching about emotions"
> > > >>>>> and at the chapter 18 (see atached) I find very interesting
> > > >>>>> mentions to Chabrier - (I guess Joseph François Chabrier that
> > > >>>>> wrote "Les émotions et les états organiques" in 1911). The
> > > >>>>> contributions from Chabrier are linked with Vygotsky's concerns
> > > >>>>> for criticize dualistic views about emotions, and to understand
> > > >>>>> actual relations between emotions and
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>> - consciousness
> > > >>>>> - culture
> > > >>>>> - ideology
> > > >>>>> - history
> > > >>>>> - and personality
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>> I search a lot for Chabrier, but there was practically nothing.
> > > >>>>> Nothing in Amazon, nothing in Google books. And French Libraries
> > > >>>>> don't send to Brazil.
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>> Somebody have any suggestion, please? Any useful kind of service
> > > >>>>> to legally obtain the book? Some kind of "East View" to French 
> > resources?
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>> Thank you very much.
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>> Achilles
> > > >>>>> from Brazil.
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>> _________________________________________________________________
> > > >>>>> Novo site do Windows Live: Novidades, dicas dos produtos e muito 
> > mais.
> > > >>>>> Conheça!
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>> http://www.windowslive.com.br/?ocid=WindowsLive09_MSN_Hotmail_Tagline_out09
> > > >>>>> _______________________________________________
> > > >>>>> xmca mailing list
> > > >>>>> xmca@weber.ucsd.edu
> > > >>>>> http://dss.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/xmca
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>> _______________________________________________
> > > >>> xmca mailing list
> > > >>> xmca@weber.ucsd.edu
> > > >>> http://dss.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/xmca
> > > >> 
> > > >> _________________________________________________________________
> > > >> Converse e compartilhe fotos ao mesmo tempo. Saiba como no novo Site 
> > de Windows Live.
> > > >> http://www.windowslive.com.br/?ocid=WindowsLive09_MSN_Hotmail_Tagline_out09_______________________________________________
> > > >> xmca mailing list
> > > >> xmca@weber.ucsd.edu
> > > >> http://dss.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/xmca
> > > > 
> > > > _________________________________________________________________
> > > > Agora a pressa é amiga da perfeição. Chegou o Windows 7. Conheça!
> > > > http://www.microsoft.com/brasil/windows7/default.html?WT.mc_id=1539_______________________________________________
> > > > xmca mailing list
> > > > xmca@weber.ucsd.edu
> > > > http://dss.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/xmca
> > > > 
> > > 
> > > -- 
> > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > Andy Blunden http://www.erythrospress.com/
> > > Classics in Activity Theory: Hegel, Leontyev, Meshcheryakov, 
> > > Ilyenkov $20 ea
> > > 
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > xmca mailing list
> > > xmca@weber.ucsd.edu
> > > http://dss.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/xmca
> >  
> > _________________________________________________________________
> > Você já ama o Messenger? Conheça ainda mais sobre ele no Novo site de 
> > Windows Live.
> > http://www.windowslive.com.br/?ocid=WindowsLive09_MSN_Hotmail_Tagline_out09_______________________________________________
> > xmca mailing list
> > xmca@weber.ucsd.edu
> > http://dss.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/xmca
> > 
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > xmca mailing list
> > xmca@weber.ucsd.edu
> > http://dss.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/xmca
> > 
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > xmca mailing list
> > xmca@weber.ucsd.edu
> > http://dss.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/xmca
>  		 	   		  
> _________________________________________________________________
> Converse e compartilhe fotos ao mesmo tempo. Saiba como no novo Site de Windows Live.
> http://www.windowslive.com.br/?ocid=WindowsLive09_MSN_Hotmail_Tagline_out09_______________________________________________
> xmca mailing list
> xmca@weber.ucsd.edu
> http://dss.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/xmca
 		 	   		  
_________________________________________________________________
Novo windowslive.com.br. Descubra como juntar a galera com os produtos Windows Live.
http://www.windowslive.com.br/?ocid=WindowsLive09_MSN_Hotmail_Tagline_out09_______________________________________________
xmca mailing list
xmca@weber.ucsd.edu
http://dss.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/xmca