These files are maintained strictly for historical reference, research, and recordkeeping purposes,
and the content has not been altered or updated since archiving.
Content on this site may not meet current digital accessibility standards.
If you require an alternative, accessible format of any information found on this site,
please contact Bruce Jones, bjones@ucsd.edu to request an accommodation.

These files are maintained strictly for historical reference, research, and recordkeeping purposes,
and the content has not been altered or updated since archiving.
Content on this site may not meet current digital accessibility standards.
If you require an alternative, accessible format of any information found on this site,
please contact Bruce Jones, bjones@ucsd.edu to request an accommodation.


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [xmca] play and the imaginal



Or was it because 5 year olds were playing with 5 year olds, and not as part
of a multi-age community, with 7 year olds taking the lead and 3 year olds
needing to be brought into the fold?
Sue


On 20/10/10 4:46 PM, "Larry Purss" <lpscholar2@gmail.com> wrote:

> I want to think out loud about play in school settings.
> 
> In September, when 5 year olds arrive at school, they are introduced in
> Kindergarten to "centers" the spaces in Kindergarten classes where the
> children go to play.  The other day I sat down with 4 boys at the "playdough
> center"  Each child sat around the table with their own individual
> playdough. They were inteent on their individual projects but were involved
> in "parallel" play.
> Now with my "vygotskian eyes" I reflected on my position as an adult who was
> in a position to "lead" this activity and CO-ORDINATE the activity.  However
> I also was sensitive that I wanted the "agency" of the children to be
> EXPRESSED.
> The following steps were taken.
> I noticed one boy was making cookies while the others were doing their own
> thing.  I asked the boy what he was making. He replied "cookies"  [a social
> representation from another activity system] I then asked how many cookies
> he was making. "Three" he answered.  I responded, but there are five of us
> at the table [I was acting AS IF he was including all of us] He poceeded to
> make 2 more. Then I asked if he was going to share the cookies?  He replied
> they needed to go in the oven first and brought them over to a book shelf. I
> made the noise "tick, tick, tick" like a timer and one of the other boys
> said "Ding" like the chime of the oven going off.  We all laughed and the
> other boys were slowly orienting and CO-ORDINATING with my and the boys
> activity.  Then the boy who was making a person from playdough took his
> person over to the "oven" and one of the other boys said "Oh, a gingerbread
> man" Then I heard all 4 boys go "tick, tick, tick" for a long time before
> someone said "ding" and we all laughed.  Soon all 4 boys were making cookies
> with each one taking the lead and shifting the flow of activity BUT now the
> activity was co-ordinated.  When it was time to "share" the cookies I
> insisted on proper manners [we waited till we all had a cookie before we ate
> etc] This activity became more and more animated and definately the level of
> language and interactivity was being scaffolded.
> 
> Now for my question or musing.
> Was the "individual" parallel play of these students a historically situated
> form of activity because since birth, we in this culture share a notion of
> "individual" play and the encapsulated self is implied in all our activity
> OR is this form of "autistic like" play more of a universal phenomena and a
> "stage" or layer which all children pass through. My question is going back
> to the tension between socio-relational and socio-cultural analysis.
> This simple activity I participated in [and as the adult took a leading
> position] as I intentionally co-ordinated a shared activity I was creating
> will lead development and social-relational activity in a certain
> direction.  It is my version of "right-relation"
> Creating classroom "dramas" is another form of imaginal co-ordination and if
> done systematically over time will lead to a different kind of person.
> Having play centers where the children work out their relationships among
> peers [and the dominant child takes the lead] is another form of
> developmental social relations.
> 
> I am curious if the way the 5 year olds were interacting BEFORE I sat down
> with them [which seems so self-contained within their own individual space]
> is a very specific historically formed pattern of "play activity" or is the
> lack of co-ordination similar across multiple cultural settings when 5 year
> olds play without adult supervision?
> 
> Larry
> __________________________________________
> _____
> xmca mailing list
> xmca@weber.ucsd.edu
> http://dss.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/xmca


__________________________________________
_____
xmca mailing list
xmca@weber.ucsd.edu
http://dss.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/xmca