These files are maintained strictly for historical reference, research, and recordkeeping purposes,
and the content has not been altered or updated since archiving.
Content on this site may not meet current digital accessibility standards.
If you require an alternative, accessible format of any information found on this site,
please contact Bruce Jones, bjones@ucsd.edu to request an accommodation.

These files are maintained strictly for historical reference, research, and recordkeeping purposes,
and the content has not been altered or updated since archiving.
Content on this site may not meet current digital accessibility standards.
If you require an alternative, accessible format of any information found on this site,
please contact Bruce Jones, bjones@ucsd.edu to request an accommodation.


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [xmca] play and the imaginal



Sue
I would agree that in other social arrangements there would be a different
relational pattern of 7 year olds guiding 3 year olds.
My question was more centrally asking about the "influence" of historicized
development and enculturation IF we arrange to have only  5 year olds
interact with each other.  I have observed many different groupings of 5
year olds at "centers" which is an institutionalized and "artifactual"
grouping which in Canada facilitates particular kinds of social relational
patterns where the 5 year olds "parallel" play.  This is often explained as
a developmental stage. However, if it is actually historicized development,
then possibly when 5 year olds [with other patterns of enculturation] are
put in a "centers" structure may actually [at 5 years old] interact in more
mutually shared patterns [without the assistance of 7 year old or adult
guidance]  My question is about how a group of 5 year olds [without
guidance] orient and co-ordinate their activities in similar ways when put
in a "centers" environment  [ie "parallel" play"]. An alternative
possibility is that after 5 years of being enculturated in particular
relational patterns of interaction these patterns are internalized and
therefore the activities at the "centers" is more co-ordinated [among the 5
year olds without guidance]
Sue, when I entered that play world I was wondering about ontological and
historical development and similarities and differences in how 5 year olds
orient to co-ordinating activities when left to there own devices.

Larry

On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 3:24 AM, Sue March <suemarch@netspace.net.au> wrote:

> Or was it because 5 year olds were playing with 5 year olds, and not as
> part
> of a multi-age community, with 7 year olds taking the lead and 3 year olds
> needing to be brought into the fold?
> Sue
>
>
> On 20/10/10 4:46 PM, "Larry Purss" <lpscholar2@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > I want to think out loud about play in school settings.
> >
> > In September, when 5 year olds arrive at school, they are introduced in
> > Kindergarten to "centers" the spaces in Kindergarten classes where the
> > children go to play.  The other day I sat down with 4 boys at the
> "playdough
> > center"  Each child sat around the table with their own individual
> > playdough. They were inteent on their individual projects but were
> involved
> > in "parallel" play.
> > Now with my "vygotskian eyes" I reflected on my position as an adult who
> was
> > in a position to "lead" this activity and CO-ORDINATE the activity.
>  However
> > I also was sensitive that I wanted the "agency" of the children to be
> > EXPRESSED.
> > The following steps were taken.
> > I noticed one boy was making cookies while the others were doing their
> own
> > thing.  I asked the boy what he was making. He replied "cookies"  [a
> social
> > representation from another activity system] I then asked how many
> cookies
> > he was making. "Three" he answered.  I responded, but there are five of
> us
> > at the table [I was acting AS IF he was including all of us] He poceeded
> to
> > make 2 more. Then I asked if he was going to share the cookies?  He
> replied
> > they needed to go in the oven first and brought them over to a book
> shelf. I
> > made the noise "tick, tick, tick" like a timer and one of the other boys
> > said "Ding" like the chime of the oven going off.  We all laughed and the
> > other boys were slowly orienting and CO-ORDINATING with my and the boys
> > activity.  Then the boy who was making a person from playdough took his
> > person over to the "oven" and one of the other boys said "Oh, a
> gingerbread
> > man" Then I heard all 4 boys go "tick, tick, tick" for a long time before
> > someone said "ding" and we all laughed.  Soon all 4 boys were making
> cookies
> > with each one taking the lead and shifting the flow of activity BUT now
> the
> > activity was co-ordinated.  When it was time to "share" the cookies I
> > insisted on proper manners [we waited till we all had a cookie before we
> ate
> > etc] This activity became more and more animated and definately the level
> of
> > language and interactivity was being scaffolded.
> >
> > Now for my question or musing.
> > Was the "individual" parallel play of these students a historically
> situated
> > form of activity because since birth, we in this culture share a notion
> of
> > "individual" play and the encapsulated self is implied in all our
> activity
> > OR is this form of "autistic like" play more of a universal phenomena and
> a
> > "stage" or layer which all children pass through. My question is going
> back
> > to the tension between socio-relational and socio-cultural analysis.
> > This simple activity I participated in [and as the adult took a leading
> > position] as I intentionally co-ordinated a shared activity I was
> creating
> > will lead development and social-relational activity in a certain
> > direction.  It is my version of "right-relation"
> > Creating classroom "dramas" is another form of imaginal co-ordination and
> if
> > done systematically over time will lead to a different kind of person.
> > Having play centers where the children work out their relationships among
> > peers [and the dominant child takes the lead] is another form of
> > developmental social relations.
> >
> > I am curious if the way the 5 year olds were interacting BEFORE I sat
> down
> > with them [which seems so self-contained within their own individual
> space]
> > is a very specific historically formed pattern of "play activity" or is
> the
> > lack of co-ordination similar across multiple cultural settings when 5
> year
> > olds play without adult supervision?
> >
> > Larry
> > __________________________________________
> > _____
> > xmca mailing list
> > xmca@weber.ucsd.edu
> > http://dss.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/xmca
>
>
> __________________________________________
> _____
> xmca mailing list
> xmca@weber.ucsd.edu
> http://dss.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/xmca
>
__________________________________________
_____
xmca mailing list
xmca@weber.ucsd.edu
http://dss.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/xmca