These files are maintained strictly for historical reference, research, and recordkeeping purposes, and the content has not been altered or updated since archiving. Content on this site may not meet current digital accessibility standards. If you require an alternative, accessible format of any information found on this site, please contact Bruce Jones, bjones@ucsd.edu to request an accommodation.
These files are maintained strictly for historical reference, research, and recordkeeping purposes, and the content has not been altered or updated since archiving. Content on this site may not meet current digital accessibility standards. If you require an alternative, accessible format of any information found on this site, please contact Bruce Jones, bjones@ucsd.edu to request an accommodation.
> :) Huw has that one at the moment. > :) > But as "activity" is the fundamental concept of my > philosophy, I can't define it in terms of anything else, > just explain it, to give you the general idea. Here's my take: if it's a concept, then it can be derived from other concepts within the constellation (paradigm/framework). Everything is related. e.g. process can be derived from interaction of structure. System is tricky, but do-able. Huw > But, a > philosophy can only have one concept like that! > > Andy __________________________________________ _____ xmca mailing list xmca@weber.ucsd.edu http://dss.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/xmca