These files are maintained strictly for historical reference, research, and recordkeeping purposes, and the content has not been altered or updated since archiving. Content on this site may not meet current digital accessibility standards. If you require an alternative, accessible format of any information found on this site, please contact Bruce Jones, bjones@ucsd.edu to request an accommodation.
These files are maintained strictly for historical reference, research, and recordkeeping purposes, and the content has not been altered or updated since archiving. Content on this site may not meet current digital accessibility standards. If you require an alternative, accessible format of any information found on this site, please contact Bruce Jones, bjones@ucsd.edu to request an accommodation.
On 22 April 2011 02:40, Huw Lloyd <huw.softdesigns@gmail.com> wrote:
On 21 April 2011 17:11, Martin Packer <packer@duq.edu> wrote:
On Apr 21, 2011, at 2:17 AM, Andy Blunden wrote:
* The quotes you give seem to confirm for me that as a unit of an
activity, "act" is exactly the right term for his use of "word meaning."
I would say that making a meaning is an act. That speaking a meaning is
an act. But that the meaning itself is the product of an act. Likewise,
I'd say that knowing as engaging with meaning is an act.
>From Langer (L*), "Philosophy in a New Key", page viii and Jung,
"Psycholgocial Types" (J*) or, if you prefer, Hoop, "Conscious Orientation".
Here's a brief sketch of my understanding (if it's misaligned look at it in
courier):
Vygotsy Sign(L*) Perception(J*) Judgement(J*)
--------- -------- -------------- -------------
HMF (social) Symbol Intuition Thinking
LMF (Physiology) Signal Sensation Feeling
Huw
__________________________________________
_____
xmca mailing list
xmca@weber.ucsd.edu
http://dss.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/xmca