These files are maintained strictly for historical reference, research, and recordkeeping purposes, and the content has not been altered or updated since archiving. Content on this site may not meet current digital accessibility standards. If you require an alternative, accessible format of any information found on this site, please contact Bruce Jones, bjones@ucsd.edu to request an accommodation.

These files are maintained strictly for historical reference, research, and recordkeeping purposes, and the content has not been altered or updated since archiving. Content on this site may not meet current digital accessibility standards. If you require an alternative, accessible format of any information found on this site, please contact Bruce Jones, bjones@ucsd.edu to request an accommodation.


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [xmca] Al Andalus as a model for *{ }*



If I can find it!
m

On Sat, Oct 1, 2011 at 3:26 PM, Robert Lake <boblake@georgiasouthern.edu>wrote:

> Hi Mike,
> For those of us who have only joined XCMA in the last year or two. can you
> repost the distributed, "virtual course
> syllabus" ?
> Thanks so much!
> Robert Lake
>
> On Sat, Oct 1, 2011 at 4:03 PM, mike cole <lchcmike@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>  As a serendipitous footnote. I was looking for a book on my shelves and
>> came
>> across
>> Manicus a history and philosophy of the social sciences. Where had I seen
>> this before?
>>
>> xmca I thought.
>>
>> I googled Manicus on lchc and sure enough, came up with the following
>> fragment from an earlier discussion:
>>
>> An interesting tip from a colleague.
>> mike
>> -------------------
>>
>> "...a kind of historically oriented unified social science with
>> overlapping,
>> non-discrete, connected concerns."
>>
>> In: Peter T. Manicas, "A", page 214.
>>
>>
>> Spelling that out a little more vis a vis inter-tradition-mashups it comes
>> in a chapter on the americanization of social sciences and the way in
>> which
>> its founders selectively appropriated what they had learned.
>>
>>
>> "They were German.... in thinking of *Geisteswissenschaft *as a kind of
>>
>> historically oriented unified social science with overlapping,
>> non-discrete,
>> connected concerns.:
>>
>> A rhyzhome, a fungle entanglement....??
>>
>> Certainly descriptive of the situation that we find ourselves in, although
>> I
>> believe we are witnessing a variety of reinventions of the humane sciences
>> of the 19th century.
>>
>> mike
>> On Sat, Oct 1, 2011 at 12:39 PM, mike cole <lchcmike@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> > Both Larry and Christine.
>> >
>> > I have continued thinking about ways to make clearer affinities across
>> > traditions/
>> > discourse communities. I have thought of two ideas with respect to the
>> > recent interchanges.
>> >
>> > 1. Do you think that it is possible to write up a journal-length paper
>> that
>> > summarizes
>> > your takes on the synergisms among traditions that you see? Quite apart
>> > from
>> > interest in MCA, this sort of topic should fit with the new Valsiner
>> > journal on integrative psychological and behavioral sciences. Two
>> potential
>> > places to get it out.
>> >
>> > and/or
>> >
>> > 2. Might it be possible to put together a "distributed, virtual course
>> > syllabus" of the sort that we did a few years ago on Vygotsky & Co. on
>> xmca?
>> >
>> > Either could be very helpful.
>> >
>> > And while you are at it, what does it take to get serious discussion
>> going
>> > with the
>> > social representation folks out there in xmca-land? (I am reminded
>> because
>> > I am
>> > using some materials by Sandra Jovchelovich in my current grad seminar)?
>> >
>> > Thanks for passing along Rene's intro, Larry. The integration of art
>> into
>> > our conversations in recent years, along with performance and play,
>> > certainly are
>> > important and Rene's thoughts are always interesting to read.
>> >
>> > mike
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > On Sat, Oct 1, 2011 at 10:51 AM, christine schweighart <
>> > schweighartgate@hotmail.com> wrote:
>> >
>> >>
>> >> Dear Mike,
>> >> I am just encountering Borgerson's 'witnessing' and 'irreplacibility
>> etc -
>> >> and I am finding that F. Gonzalez Rey's Chapter helps untangle some
>> sticking
>> >> points  sympathetic to Borgerson who does still use  'inter-subjective'
>> and
>> >> some key terms in a way that coud be brought out differently.
>> >>
>> >> And yes - fungal mycelium - as Alan has researched them- is much more
>> >> relational than a previous  rhizome metaphor.  Alan brings out  a
>> different
>> >> ontology,  and not only metaphoric  contrasts in his work, he does
>> extend
>> >> implications from his empirical scientific and uses metaphor to convey
>> his
>> >> thinking in his work and art too.
>> >> Yes Ingold already thought so - thanks for that observation.  Curiously
>> he
>> >> is aware of Alan's work too.
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> http://books.google.co.uk/books?id=S3GakE5OT-kC&lpg=PA426&ots=ViCvqWkJ5A&dq=ingold%20rhizome&pg=PA426#v=onepage&q=ingold%20rhizome&f=false
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> Christine.
>> >>
>> >>  __________________________________________
>> >> _____
>> >> xmca mailing list
>> >> xmca@weber.ucsd.edu
>> >> http://dss.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/xmca
>> >>
>> >
>> >
>> __________________________________________
>> _____
>> xmca mailing list
>> xmca@weber.ucsd.edu
>> http://dss.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/xmca
>>
>
>
>
> --
> *Robert Lake  Ed.D.
> *Assistant Professor
> Social Foundations of Education
> Dept. of Curriculum, Foundations, and Reading
> Georgia Southern University
> P. O. Box 8144
> Phone: (912) 478-5125
> Fax: (912) 478-5382
> Statesboro, GA  30460
>
>  *Democracy must be born anew in every generation, and education is its
> midwife.*
> *-*John Dewey.
>
>
>
__________________________________________
_____
xmca mailing list
xmca@weber.ucsd.edu
http://dss.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/xmca